The 'removing' or 'erasing' history line is silly. We're talking about the focusing on and glorification of a small part of Southern history, and doing so of only one 'side' of the time, the pro-slavery side. The South is not filled with statutes of, say, George Thomas (Southern but Union General) or schools named after, say, William Carney (Southern born African-American Union soldier and recipient of the Medal of Honor), it is filled with statues of Confederate leaders and schools named after them. It's a purposeful choosing of an abominable cause and glorifying it beyond and above all other history in the region. There is no good reason to continue it.
In response to this article:
In response to this article:
Historians debate the value and place for Confederate monuments, memorials and other symbols.
No comments:
Post a Comment
you got something to say... please say it