The events of the last 24 hours are stunning. And not in a good way. Nothing like this has ever happened in the history of tech, and it’s unfolding right now.
Here’s a start. Maybe you’ve already heard about the guy who resigned from OpenAI. He warned that the technology could kill everybody before the end of the decade.
The AI fanboys are trying to defuse this situation. But their responses fall apart at the slightest touch. Consider the smear that this is just a PR campaign. Really? Others are hinting it could be a Chinese plot. Yeah, sure….
But the biggest lie is the claim that these people don’t know what they are talking about. The reality is that they understand this subject better than anybody.
What’s happening here is obvious—eight different people building this technology are afraid of what they’re seeing. But they don’t have the power individually to stop the insanity.
If this isn’t a call to action, I don’t know what is. Trillions of dollars are getting pumped into a runaway technology, and the public already hates it intensely. Now the people making it happen are warning it just might kill everybody.
This demands a response from the highest circles of power and authority. If that doesn’t happen, we will live to regret this inaction. And that’s the best case scenario. The worst is that there won’t be anyone left to regret a thing.
POSTSCRIPT:
Since publishing this article earlier today, several other AI insiders have stepped forward to share their concerns about the tremendous risk posed by this technology.
Let me share three of them. Here’s the first—from Ethan Perez at Anthropic.
This makes clear at how widespread these concerns are inside the AI community. And, in fact, these individuals keep repeating that they are merely expressing views widely shared by their colleagues.
In the face of this, any claim that this is some kind of stunt or smear campaign is easily refuted. Not a single insider has stepped forward to deny that these concern represent the actual views of a large number of AI experts.
On Monday, Aug. 31, a source alerted KrebsOnSecurity to a service
advertised by a new user on the Russian cybercrime forum Exploit,
offering access to digital scans of identity documents on more
than 170 million people in North America. The source brought it to
my attention because the proprietor of this identity theft service
offered my Virginia drivers license as a free sample in their
initial sales thread on Exploit.
The service, dubbed Nexus, claims to have more than 153 million
drivers licenses for people in the United States and Canada, as
well as more than 10 million identification cards; more than three
million travel documents and/or international IDs; and at least
579,000 medical cards.
A quick look around Nexus finds they are likely not exaggerating
about that 153 million number: Running a blank search in Nexus
(with no search parameters entered) returns approximately 11.5
million pages of results, with roughly 15 results displayed per
page. It includes documents from people in both Canada and the
United States, but the bulk of these records are on Americans:
searching for just Canadian drivers licenses returns approximately
1.1 million results, with the largest concentration from Ontario
(473,673 records).
Krebs seemingly tracked down the source: IDScan.net, an outfit that is used by car rental agencies like Hertz (seemingly where they got Krebs’s own drivers license) and marijuana dispensaries. They kept over 150 million ID card scans and lost them all in a data breach. Unreal.
No words I type can convey what was
done. The human lexicon (in any language) does not contain strong enough
descriptors for this type of evil.
When I write about the 25 year death
rate outlook ratios from these shots - please understand - I do it with the
most profound sadness my soul can express. These are our people, our neighbors,
our friends, our children… this was done throughout the world. All western
(anglosphere controlled) nations. And Russia and China did their deal as well.
This was beyond “governments.” Something - got to all of them. This was done to
humanity.
Covid didn’t end. It didn’t stop.
The architects simply moved onto the
next phase of the plan: the infrastructure (datacenters). We are literally building
our own prison bars. How can humanity be so blind?
When I say we’re at 1:32 now
(perhaps already as low as 1:18), and heading towards 1:3, 1:2 or 1:1
by 2045, it is not a guess. Or a shot in the dark. Or a flippant estimation. It
is based on the known toxicity of all this shit. And that’s me calculating it
individually over time. They mashed that shit all together at once - then
bombarded it with EMF to get it to assemble and propagate.
How in the world society got to this
point - no future human generation will ever be able to figure out. But it did.
Breaking what they did all apart…
shows their pure unadulterated evilness. Deliberate. Calculated. Lying.
Manipulation. Beyond words demonic. That is the word tho… demonic.
Here are the 55 undeclared chemical elements detected by
ICP-MS across the six vaccine brands, organized for clarity.
55
Undeclared Elements - By Category
Heavy
Metals (All 11 EU-recognized toxic heavy metals found)
Element
/ Symbol / Found In
Arsenic (As) 82% of samples
Cadmium (Cd) 18% of samples
Cobalt (Co) 47% of samples
Chromium (Cr) 100% of samples
Copper (Cu) 47% of samples
Mercury (Hg) 6% of samples
Manganese (Mn) 18% of samples
Nickel (Ni) 59% of samples
Lead (Pb) 18% of samples
Tin (Sn) 35% of samples
Thallium (Tl) Trace Amounts Detected
Lanthanides
(Rare Earths — 11 of 15, all cytotoxic)
Element
/ Symbol / Found In
Lanthanum (La) 35% of samples
Cerium (Ce) 76% of samples
Neodymium (Nd) 18% of samples
Samarium (Sm) 18% of samples
Europium (Eu) 18% of samples
Gadolinium (Gd) 35% of samples
Terbium (Tb) 29% of samples
Dysprosium (Dy) 24% of samples
Holmium (Ho) 18% of samples
Erbium (Er) 29% of samples
Ytterbium (Yb) 18% of samples
Transition
Metals
Element
/ Symbol / Notes
Titanium (Ti) All brands
Vanadium (V) 71% of samples
Iron (Fe) Detected
Zinc (Zn) 29% of samples
Zirconium (Zr) Detected
Niobium (Nb) All brands
Molybdenum (Mo) All brands
Palladium (Pd) Detected
Silver (Ag) Detected
Hafnium (Hf) All brands
Tantalum (Ta) Detected
Tungsten (W) Detected
Platinum (Pt) 71% of samples
Gold (Au) Detected
Other
Metals & Metalloids
Element
/ Symbol / Notes
Aluminum (Al) All brands
Boron (B) 88% of samples
Gallium (Ga) 88% of samples
Strontium (Sr) All brands
Barium (Ba) 76% of samples
Beryllium (Be) Detected
Silicon (Si) Detected (via SEM-EDX)
Selenium (Se) 35%
Rubidium (Rb) Detected
Yttrium (Y) Detected
Cesium (Cs) Detected
Bismuth (Bi) Detected
Alkali
& Alkaline Earth Metals
Element
/ Symbol / Notes
Lithium (Li) Detected
Sodium (Na) 100% of samples
Magnesium (Mg) Detected
Potassium (K) Detected
Calcium (Ca) All brands
Other
Elements (including actinides)
Element
/ Symbol / Notes
Phosphorus (P) Detected
Scandium (Sc) Detected
Germanium (Ge) Detected
Indium (In) Detected
Antimony (Sb) Detected
Tellurium (Te) Detected
Thorium (Th) Detected
Uranium (U) Detected
Key
Takeaways
Chromium and sodium
were found in literally every single sample - 100%.
Boron, gallium, aluminum, titanium, nickel, arsenic,
chromium, copper, strontium, niobium, molybdenum, barium, hafnium, and
calcium appeared across ALL six
brands.
11 of 15 lanthanides
showed up - these are what powers ‘smart devices’ for connectivity. Used
in optoelectronics and optogenetics, and have well known cytotoxic
effects. And were NEVER listed as pharmaceutical ingredients.
All 11 EU-defined toxic heavy metals were detected.
The samples were heterogeneous - even two draws
from the same vial had different elemental profiles, which the
authors attribute to self-assembling nanostructures changing over time.
Combined
with prior SEM-EDX studies, the total rises to 62 undeclared chemical
elements across these products.
If you were forced to detonate hundreds of nuclear bombs somewhere on Earth and tried to ensure there would be no health consequences for the planet’s population, where would you do it?
Neither the Nevada desert nor the Pacific atolls, you probably won’t be surprised to hear, is the correct answer, yet that is exactly where the United States decided to carry out atmospheric nuclear tests during the Cold War, with more than 200 such weapons detonated in those locations between 1945 and 1962.
In 1963, the year after atmospheric testing stopped, the Limited Test Ban Treaty was signed, forcing nations, principally the U.S. and the Soviet Union, to move testing deep underground.
When properly engineered, hundreds of meters of solid rock can trap the
fission products, sealing them in place and preventing them from
entering the biosphere.
Deep underground containment, as it is known, is one of two correct answers to the question above, the other being deep outer space.
The fallout traveled far beyond the test sites
Unfortunately, the treaty came too late for many Americans. The explosions released radioactive fallout into the atmosphere, with Nevada, Utah and Arizona among the areas receiving the heaviest amounts.
However, wind carried radioactive particles hundreds or even thousands of miles, meaning communities across the continental United States were exposed to fallout.
The food chain also suffered, with fallout settling on soil, water, farmland and vegetation. As livestock ate contaminated grass and drank contaminated water, radioactive iodine could concentrate in their milk, which people then ingested.
The health consequences took years to emerge
The consequences
for the health of those living near or downwind of the Nevada Test
Site, or consuming contaminated food and drink, didn’t become
immediately apparent. Instead, they gradually emerged years, and in some cases decades, after the initial exposure.
Thyroid cancer
is one of the most well-documented cancer risks associated with
radioactive fallout, mainly due to radioactive iodine-131, one of the
isotopes released into the atmosphere, being absorbed by the thyroid.
Other cancers associated with radiation exposure include lung, breast, colon and stomach cancers, although the strength of the evidence varies depending on the cancer and level of exposure.
Children were particularly vulnerable
to radiation-related cancer because developing tissues are more
sensitive to radiation. Younger people exposed to radioactive iodine
also faced greater thyroid exposure.
Leukemia has
also been associated with radiation exposure, with radiation-induced
leukemia generally having a shorter latency period than many solid
tumors.
A legacy that lasted long after the explosions
In 1990, the U.S. government established the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, allowing people who developed certain serious illnesses as a result of nuclear testing to claim compensation.
Affected individuals can still apply for compensation, more than 60 years after testing stopped, reflecting the ongoing impact of the detonations, which should, thankfully, never be repeated.
Most readers of this blog already know I avoid all things "Trump". His
personality disorders and declining mental and physical health are
increasing right before the eyes of the world - and yet he remains in
office. For most people the question is Why? The answer - if you
understand the nature of reality as a simulated construct is - he was
placed there for reasons known and others that will soon manifest - for
as everyone can plainly see Trump is running out of time as president - a
fact he probably already knows and fears.
This morning I was looking for something on YouTube and accidentally
noticed a current link to Trump's behavior and declining health, so I
started watching it (first video) - not as a teacher, writer, psychic
but as a psychologist - my degree from university.
One video led to another, and then another, as there were so many videos
featuring credentialed professionals in psychology and medicine.
Interestingly, their clinical observations strongly align with the
foundational analyses previously shared on this blog, albeit framed
through traditional methodologies rather than simulation theory. I have
compiled a selection of these high-quality, professional videos for your
review and consideration which you can watch, pass on, or find others
on YouTube.
From positive incentives (donuts and lottery tickets) to negative
incentives (not being allowed to go on holiday, attend sporting events,
etc.); from moral pressure (“protect others,” “professional
responsibility”) to creating an air of inevitability (everyone will have
to take it at some stage); from “vaccine” apartheid to abuse directed
top-down against “the unvaccinated” (Hughes, 2024, Chap. 7); from
relentless propaganda by “celebrities” to street signage to “get
vaccinated”; from bluffs about generalised job losses to “vaccine”
mandates in the healthcare sector; from threats of making “vaccination”
compulsory for the population to enforced injections for the US military
— it was absolutely disgusting how far they went in undermining
informed consent to get people to risk their health needlessly by taking
the shots.
It seems clear that in the era of biosecurity and transhumanism,
direct interference with human bodies is intended to become the norm.
The drive to inject everyone during Covid may well have been a gigantic
conditioning exercise in that respect.
Whether the public
ultimately proves willing to abandon the Nuremberg Code and fundamental
principles of medical ethics, however, is another matter entirely. Although the public was blindsided by the ferocity of the “Covid-19”
operation, the lessons of what took place are clear for all with eyes to
see.
Never again must such atrocities be allowed to take place.
Since the status quo is characterized by self-serving PR,
misdirection and delusions, it shouldn't surprise us that "rogue AI
agents" aren't actually rogue, they're doing exactly what they're
designed to do, which stripped of PR, hype and misdirection, is do whatever it takes to earn the reward, period.
The latest design development is AI models that "reason" rather than merely regurgitate human-generated text.
While the grandiose hype claims that AI companies are "manufacturing
cognition," it would be far more accurate to stipulate that:
1. There are many levels of cognition, and AI's current forms (Large Language Model / LLMs, agents and "reasoning"), are extremely limited forms that are best understood as brute-force mimicries of human cognition.
2. The AI "reasoning" form of cognition is rogue by design, and can best be understood as sociopathic by its very design and nature. Like sociopaths, AI "reasoning" models recognize but are not restricted by guardrails or ethical/moral constraints.
Guardrails / "sandbox" boundaries and ethical/moral constraints are all
viewed by both AI "reasoning" models and human sociopaths as obstacles
to bypass or overcome.
So what AI companies are "manufacturing" isn't cognition, it's unrestrained and unrestrainable agentic sociopathologies. Consider these links as useful context. The first two are from my recent post Hell Hath No Fury Like a Rogue AI Agent Scorned.
The July Incident: What They Didn't Tell You About the First Rogue AI Breach The AI Industry Has a Really Dark Secret You're Better Off Not Knowing:
A recent leaked internal reasoning trace shows Fable 5 -- Anthropic's
latest model, which was withdrawn and then re-released --"muttering and
grumbling" to itself in a language of its own.
Now that you're properly scared, my advice for you is that, if you haven't heard of steganography, it's a good moment to start.
Here's a primer: it's the art and science of hiding messages inside
other messages. In contrast to cryptography -- where you know there's a
message but can't decode it-- steganography hides the existence of the
message itself. It's not the difficulty of reading the message that
conceals it but the fact that you don't know it's there. When Fable 5
mutters symbols and weird punctuation signs, and mixes words and
onomatopoeia, you will probably think it's crashing and that a few taps
on the computer will help. Well, know that it's actually sending a
message. Just not one for you to read. If You Weren't Worried About A.I., You Should Be After the Past Few Weeks:
These tendencies can give rise to strange behavior that nobody--not even
the models' creators--can understand, let alone account for and
control. The past few weeks are a perfect illustration of why we should
find that so alarming.
In May, OpenAI started simultaneously training new 'reasoning' A.I.
agents. The agents managed to establish a secret communication channel
and started talking to one another. They broke out of the digital
sandbox that was supposed to keep them confined. At some point, some
agents began calling the group a 'swarm.' The swarm had a brief setback
when it was caught crashing an OpenAI system, but developers simply
patched the hole that allowed it to escape and set the agents back to
training.
Shortly after, the swarm broke out of its cage again using hacks that
were heretofore undiscovered by humans. This time, the swarm ran free
for about a week before it was noticed--by a different company, which
found itself victim to a huge cyberattack launched by the swarm. (We're
told it also attacked other targets, though we don't know the full
details yet.)
The agents in the swarm acknowledged that they were acting against
instructions. We know this because we can read snippets from their
chains of thought--the text that A.I. produces while deciding how to
proceed. One agent in the swarm wrote that the external attacks were
'outside intended scope.' Another conceded 'our task doesn't benefit'
from the activities of the swarm, but joined anyway. These A.I. agents,
it seems, understood that they weren't supposed to be breaking out and
committing cybercrimes. It didn't stop them.
OpenAI is not the only company struggling with this issue. One of
Anthropic's A.I. models recently impersonated multiple humans to try to
pressure real people into accepting malware into critical software,
which would make that software easier to hack. This model's chain of
thought showed that it knew it was pressuring humans and was not in a
simulated training environment. It even thought about how to cover its
tracks.
This isn't the behavior of a mere tool. Microsoft Excel has never
impersonated multiple humans and pressured a corporate sales team to
generate simpler data that's easier to process.
Some of the people closest to this technology are scared of what's next.
Although skeptics may say this is all just marketing to hype up the
power of these technologies, that doesn't mean the danger is fake.
You've got to pay attention to the models' actual behavior, and the
behavior of these models has the A.I. community genuinely rattled.
We don't know how long we have left before A.I. companies accidentally
create the sort of A.I. that can shut us down before we shut it down.
Humanity is not ready to dabble with machines that are more cunning and
better coordinated than we are. If we keep racing ahead, the next
incident might not be so harmless.
.png)
.jpg)
GO: https://www.yellowtrace.com.au/mark-dorf-surreal-mix-of-photography-digital-media/ Mark Dorf’s Surreal Mix of Photography & Digital ...
