what if...
 |
Section 1: The Perfect Misdirection
There exists a magician's trick so elegant that even those who suspect deception remain trapped within its design. The trick has three parts: show the audience a frightening virus from a Chinese wet market, then reveal it might actually be from a laboratory leak, all while concealing the third truth—there was no virus at all. This was an operation against the world.
The genius of this misdirection lies not in what it reveals but in what it conceals through revelation itself. While the world debates whether spike proteins cause myocarditis or cross the blood-brain barrier, whether they persist for weeks or months, whether they shed from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, no one asks the fundamental question: what if these proteins were never produced at all? The debate itself becomes the deception, a masterpiece of narrative control that captures believers and skeptics alike in an endless argument about ghosts.
Consider how perfectly this binary trap functions. Those who accept the establishment narrative worry about a naturally occurring virus jumping from bats to humans. Those who question it focus on gain-of-function research and laboratory origins. Both sides accept the fundamental premise—that there is something spreading, something infectious, something to fear. Neither side examines whether the entire foundation might be fabricated, whether the deaths attributed to a virus might have resulted from the response itself, from protocols and treatments that killed while everyone looked elsewhere for an invisible enemy.
The spike protein serves as the perfect phantom menace. Vaccine advocates proclaim these proteins create immunity. Critics warn they cause devastating injuries. Both sides marshal evidence, cite studies, debate mechanisms. Yet as Stefano Scoglio discovered when he demanded direct isolation of spike proteins from vaccinated individuals, no one has ever found them. Every study uses laboratory-created "recombinant" proteins. The entire discourse revolves around something that exists only in computer models and test tubes, never in the bodies of those injected.
This represents perhaps the most sophisticated psychological operation ever conducted. It weaponizes fear bidirectionally—the vaccinated fear the virus, the unvaccinated fear the vaccine's spike proteins. Everyone remains terrified of invisible particles that don't exist while the actual crime proceeds unnoticed: the injection of undeclared elements designed for purposes that have nothing to do with immunity, the murder of patients through ventilators and toxic drug combinations, the transformation of society through manufactured crisis.
Purge ongoing
“Trump Fires More Than a Dozen Independent Inspectors General at a Series of Agencies.” AP News, January 25, 2025.
So what can we do about it?
We're Losing The Internet. But It's Not Too Late
Governments are conducting a sneak attack on the internet and we’re about to lose what we didn’t even know we had.
In the UK, they may have already lost it. The Online Safety Act, which was smuggled into British law on the pretext of restricting access to porn, went live last week. Already it has led to Spotify, Reddit, Twitter/X, YouTube and a load of other websites blocking access unless you upload ID for age verification. The law, which the UK government initially said would only apply to adult content, was written in such a broad way that it brings a huge amount of internet traffic into its orbit. For example, and you can read it here, the law prohibits, without ID verification, access to any content which “realistically depicts serious violence against a fictional creature or the serious injury of a fictional creature.” So, cartoons. SpongeBob. Tom & Jerry. Roadrunner. It would be a joke, but unlike SpongeBob, it’s really not funny. It also prohibits access to any type of "violent content” meaning large amounts of graphic content from the holocaust of Gaza is no longer free to access on sites like Reddit and Twitter/X. Maybe the timing is purely coincidental, but it really doesn’t feel like it.
Because sites don’t want to be liable for showing adult content, even in the form of song lyrics or a comically large hammer to the head of a cartoon cat, the legally expedient thing for them to do is require verification. To verify ages, these sites are using a variety of shady verification companies, some of which have connections to the security state, with a number of them owned and operated by ex-Israeli spies. (Yes I realise this is becoming a common theme).
One of the main Israeli players in the authentication space is AU10TIX, founded by former officers in Israel’s counterintelligence agency, Shin Bet. It’s current CEO is Dan Yerushalmi, a former Unit 8200 Israeli intelligence spook. The facial recognition technology used by AU10TIX is based on the same software used by the IDF and Shin Bet to compile images of every Palestinian who enters Israel from the West Bank. AU10TIX was previously used by Twitter/X to verify user identities when signing up to its premium service. Current AU10TIX clients include PayPal, Google, Uber and international banks including Nordea, Santander and Denmark’s Saxo Bank.
Other Israeli age verification firms run by former Israeli intelligence officers include Scanovate, Identiq and AGEify. There are of course non-Israeli owned verification companies who may not be passing all your details onto the Mossad to check if you’ve ever said free Palestine. But there are no restrictions on what these companies can do with your data, no laws on what data they can collect and who they can sell it to. And if you care about not living under fascism, this is important. More on that later.
It’s not just the UK. A blanket ban on under-16s accessing social media is due to come into force in Australia by the end of the year. The only way to prevent access to under-16s is to know everyone’s age, so the Australian law requires anyone who wants to access a social media site - Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter/X, TikTok - to verify themselves using government ID. Law makers in New Zealand are pushing a similar ban.
Beginning next week, YouTube is rolling out ID and age verification for a small number of users. The idea is to test and refine processes before rolling it out globally. States across the US have enacted age verification laws and there is a push for a federal bill to cover the whole country. The EU is pushing ahead with an identikit bill to the UK’s. All of course under the guise of protecting children from adult content.
OMG! WTH?
WHO SAID THEY COULD DO THIS?
THE GREAT STARLINK RE-ENTRY EVENT: SpaceX just conducted a giant uncontrolled experiment in atmospheric chemistry.
Earlier this year, analysts noticed something strange: Starlink satellites were falling out of the sky--a lot of them. Four to five per day were re-entering Earth's atmosphere and vaporizing in plain sight. This went on for months. Between December 2024 and July 2025, more than 525 Starlinks deorbited.
Above: The number of Starlinks deorbited each month since 2020.
What’s going on? In short: routine housecleaning. These were mostly first-generation (Gen1) satellites, deliberately retired to make room for newer models. SpaceX is currently launching up to 50 new Starlinks per week, maintaining a fleet of 8,000 satellites. Weeding out the old ones is just business as usual.
What’s not usual is the atmospheric fallout. The fiery re-entry of even one Gen1 Starlink satellite produces about 30 kilograms of aluminum oxide vapor, a compound that erodes the ozone layer. A new study finds these oxides have increased 8-fold between 2016 and 2022, and the Great Re-entry Event increases this pollution even more.
To put this into perspective: Before the first Starlink launches began in 2019, only about 40 to 50 satellites re-entered per year. SpaceX just brought down ten years' worth in only six months, adding an estimated 15,000 kilograms of aluminum oxide to the upper atmosphere.
Right: A current map of Starlink satellites orbiting Earth. [more]
Even before the current surge, scientists were sounding the alarm. In February 2023, NASA flew a WB-57 aircraft over Alaska at 60,000 feet to collect stratospheric aerosols. A study published later that year found 10% of sampled particles contained aluminum and other metals from the "burn-up" of satellites.
With multiple companies racing to deploy megaconstellations, projections suggest more than 60,000 satellites could be in orbit by 2040. That means reentry debris could soon rival the natural influx of meteoroids, but with very different chemistry. Meteors are mostly rock. Satellites are mostly metal.
A simulation by NOAA scientists suggests that aluminum-rich space dust could heat the stratosphere and mesosphere by up to 1.5°C, and slow the southern polar vortex, potentially altering global weather patterns.
What happens next? We’re about to find out.
oh yeah...
-
Dean Henderson and Jeff discuss current events and take a whack at the global oligarchy. Check out more info from Jeff Rense at Alt News ...
-
Burt Bacharach, Music artist Co-author (with lyricist Hal David) of an extensive string of hits in the '60s, Burt Bacharach is one of...
